"THERE IS no doubt THAT 3 TOWERS WERE demolished ON 9/11 WTC"
"a masterpiece of demolition" - 9/11 science verdict
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Nano-thermite took down the WTC. 9/11 Controlled Demolition.
Monday, August 24, 2009
Obama White House Versus CIA - Panetta has reportedly chafed at reporting through the director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair.
- according to the senior adviser who said Blair is equally unhappy with Panetta."
"Profanity-laced screaming match" at the White House involving CIA Director Leon Panetta, and expected release of another damning internal investigation about torturing detainees during interrogations
Panetta was reportedly upset over plans by Attorney General Eric Holder to open a criminal investigation of allegations that CIA officers broke the law in carrying out certain interrogation techniques that President Obama has termed "torture."
~ Cia should investigate, or be investigated, as to who and how carried out 9/11 nanothermite controlled demolition attacks
Friday, August 14, 2009
Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11
George W. Bush claiming he saw the first plane hit, on TV, before entering the Florida classroom.
This is not possible, as there was NO live TV coverage of a first hit.
The video of Naudet brothers of the first hit surfaced 1 day after, on Sept. 12, 2001.
Monday, August 10, 2009
US President legally becomes dictator
If another attack occurs against the US, false-flag or real, President Obama has the legal authority to declare himself the sole authority of US government, bypassing any authority of Congress and the Federal Court System.
Under National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), issued May 9, 2007, if the President declares a “national emergency,” all government authority is “coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches.
This means that the President is the legal dictator of the United States, with only his discretion allowing influence by Congress and/or the Courts. Details of this plan are secret for “national security,” even to the members in Congress on the Committee for Homeland Security
If the President invoked NSPD-51 and the states’ National Guards to suppress public protest, Americans would have to be arrested and detained in large facilities. For the past several years, FEMA has been constructing and renovating such “camps” with Congressional funding.[11] The existence of detention camps for Americans was originally disclosed to the public in Congressional Hearings on the Iran-Contra scandal in 1987 under the name REX-84
False Flag Operations
"In history, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff unanimously approved of a US-initiated false-flag operation in 1962, named Operation Northwoods.
The plan included killing American citizens and/or US military personnel, blaming Cuba, and then riding public anger for a military operation to invade Cuba.
False-flag operations have been used extensively in history to rally public opinion for an offensive war"
Monday, August 3, 2009
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Cia former translator: Bin Laden was US proxy until 9/11
Uighurs from west China province Xinjiang received training from Cia aligned al Qaeda in Afghanistan before 2001, with Cia knowledge and support
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Bush-Cheney official version, official explanation, public perception
A couple of thoughts on your interesting text, Howard.
The term "Bush-Cheney theory" .. I have never heard it before. I'm not sure if it is the most exact or efficient term. ...
How about "public perception of events", or "publicly accepted version of events" ...... "is patently wrong, by now per irrefutable scientific evidence".
A private note
NOTHING, nothing from above, nothing that is being currently "publicly officially perceived" or "publicly officially accepted", or "officially explained", is true...... Nothing.
It is that known 9/11 domino effect notion - that if one single piece of chain of events is proven false, the whole, complete event explanation collapses, and EVERYTHING becomes false, prepared operation. And that is what it really is.
This is the logical conclusion.
Petr
bcc to http://91investigate.blogspot.com/, ... need to edit parts out?
Unless all the highest relevant officials of the time are conclusively questioned under the polygraph lie detector, we will NEVER know what really happened.
The term "Bush-Cheney theory" .. I have never heard it before. I'm not sure if it is the most exact or efficient term. ...
How about "public perception of events", or "publicly accepted version of events" ...... "is patently wrong, by now per irrefutable scientific evidence".
- The official scientific technical explanation of events was irrefutably disproved, April 09, Harrit, Jones, Ryan, and was never credibly and factually explained or documented again.
In the case of building WTC-7, sudden implosive collapse, official explanation is and always was nonexistent, just as public perception that fire inside the building caused the collapse event.
- Since April of 2009, there exists the definitive, conclusive scientific evidence, that "public perception of events" and "official explanation" are both completely and factually false and wrong.
Accepted public perception being "A group of Saudi religious terrorists flew 2 hijacked airliners into WTC-1 WTC-2, causing their sudden implosion and pulverazition, flew an airliner into Pentagon, causing damage to the building, and finally another hijacked airliner crashed in Pennsylvania.
NOTHING, nothing from above, nothing that is being currently "publicly officially perceived" or "publicly officially accepted", or "officially explained", is true...... Nothing.
It is that known 9/11 domino effect notion - that if one single piece of chain of events is proven false, the whole, complete event explanation collapses, and EVERYTHING becomes false, prepared operation. And that is what it really is.
This is the logical conclusion.
Petr
bcc to http://91investigate.blogspot.com/, ... need to edit parts out?
Unless all the highest relevant officials of the time are conclusively questioned under the polygraph lie detector, we will NEVER know what really happened.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
lawsuit against Airlines, friends of courts? ..or ?
Chris,
excellent links ! :] .. as always ... maybe as part of Webtools project, would you say/blog, where do you get these, and where are you sending them ..you know what i mean ....
have you looked at blog tools ? .. you are ahead of others ....
question, Howard, anybody,
could some friends of court motion be filed with this case, stating that nano-thermite was found, therefore, airlines couldn't have and didn't have a chance to prevent "attacks", and damages to defendants ?
The evidence is also already on file with a California court.
Petr
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Christopher Maccarone; wrote:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)